While also keeping (hopefully) the liquidity/value add that Lifinity provides.
Just so there’s no confusion later on, if the gauge is removed Lifinity will consider itself absolved of its duties (such as providing liquidity) since the terms will have been violated. It goes without saying that a one-time payment for perpetual liquidity is unreasonable.
It would be great if a volume-based compensation method was added to this proposal. Last time we suggested that it was rejected, so we don’t know what is workable and what isn’t. Perhaps team members can tell us what is feasible and what isn’t?