LP Finance Grant Proposal - Leverage staking yields and grow mSOL dominance

[LPFinance]

@tmnxeq

subisidies

Looks like you’ve missed every single point here and contains no logic or proof at all. Let me respond to each point.

• LP Finance does not make it unfair to existing holders or require high cost. PLEASE, mention at least one single point that supports your idea.

• Checkout the Grant Committee post, and make sure you read through it. If you thought grants for pre-mainnet protocol is a bad idea, you should’ve mentioned it in the original post.

• Again, no proof at all.

• Read below quote. Again, I’ve clearly mentioned that LP Finance can launch without it. Please read and fully understand before any comments.

@PlayerOfBits

What is the expected positive impact of this change?

I see multiple advantages:

• It will help lighten development load from the team. If you think that there’s a valuable ancillary product, don’t wait for the team to build it - apply for a grant and do it!
• It will bring in outside perspectives for what can be build with and upon Marinade, helping remove the risk of the team getting tunnel vision.
• It will get MNDE in the hands of those willing to build up its value.
• It will help the team and community evaluate collaborations in a speedy manner without requiring an on-chain proposal to disburse.
• It will help add value to mSOL and MNDE without forcing the team to choose between increasing its treasury burn or passing on an interesting collaboration.

To make the discussion more valuable, please provide one single logical proof so that we can understand what you are trying to criticize.